Early assessment of blood culture negativity as a potential support tool for antimicrobial stewardship.

Objective: To assess whether 48-h negative blood culture (BC) bottles are still negative at the classic 120-h incubation endpoint and whether 48 h might be the time to make antimicrobial therapy decisions. Methods: Data from the first collected bottles from bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes of single patients were retrospectively analyzed. Probabilities of bottles being negative at the classic endpoint were calculated from 0 to 120 h of incubation. Results: Among BC-negative episodes (4018/4901 [82.0%]), most (2097/4018 (52.2%) occurred in medicine patients. At 48 h, probability was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.9-100.0) for all 4018 patients. Of these, 1244 (31.0%) patients remained on antibiotics until 120 h. Excluding 401 (32.2%) patients who received antibiotics for another (non-bloodstream) infection, 843 (67.8%) of 1244 patients could have merited early (48-h) discontinuation of antibiotics. Stopping treatment in these patients would have led to saving 5201 days of access (943 [18.1%] days), watch (3624 [69.7%] days), or reserve (634 [12.2%]) AWaRe groups' antibiotics, which correspond to 65.6% (5201/7928) of days of administered antibiotics in all 1244 patients. Conclusion: As an early indicator of BC negativity, the 48-h endpoint could reliably support antimicrobial stewardship, but the clinical judgment remains imperative especially when BSI is highly suspected.

Pilot study on cultural and metagenomic analysis of bile and biliary stentslead to unveiling the key players in stent occlusion.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) with biliary stenting is a minimally invasive medical procedure employed to address both malignant and benign obstructions within the biliary tract. Benign biliary strictures (BBSs), typically arising from surgical interventions such as liver transplants and cholecystectomy, as well as chronic inflammatory conditions, present a common clinical challenge. The current gold standard for treating BBSs involves the periodic insertion of plastic stents at intervals of 3-4 months, spanning a course of approximately one year. Unfortunately, stent occlusion emerges as a prevalent issue within this treatment paradigm, leading to the recurrence of symptoms and necessitating repeated ERCPs. In response to this clinical concern, we initiated a pilot study, delving into the microbial composition present in bile and on the inner surfaces of plastic stents. This investigation encompassed 22 patients afflicted by BBSs who had previously undergone ERCP with plastic stent placement. Our preliminary findings offered promising insights into the microbial culprits behind stent occlusion, with Enterobacter and Lactobacillus spp. standing out as prominent bacterial species known for their biofilm-forming tendencies on stent surfaces. These revelations hold promise for potential interventions, including targeted antimicrobial therapies aimed at curtailing bacterial growth on stents and the development of advanced stent materials boasting anti-biofilm properties.

In-depth characterization of multidrug-resistant NDM-1 and KPC-3 co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream isolates from Italian hospital patients.

Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) poses significant challenges, particularly when the infecting isolate carries multiple antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes/determinants. This study, employing short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing, characterizes six New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM) 1 and KP carbapenemase (KPC) 3 co-producing KP isolates, the largest cohort investigated in Europe to date. Five [sequence type (ST) 512] and one (ST11) isolates were recovered from patients who developed BSI from February to August 2022 or February 2023 at two different hospitals in Rome, Italy. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two distinct clusters among ST512 isolates and a separate cluster for the ST11 isolate. Beyond blaNDM-1 and blaKPC-3, various AMR genes, indicative of a multidrug resistance phenotype, including colistin resistance, were found. Each cluster-representative ST512 isolate harbored a blaNDM-1 plasmid (IncC) and a blaKPC-3 plasmid [IncFIB(pQil)/IncFII(K)], while the ST11 isolate harbored a blaNDM-1 plasmid [IncFII(pKPX1)] and a blaKPC-3 plasmid [IncFIB(K)/IncFII(K)]. The blaNDM-1 plasmids carried genes conferring resistance to clinically relevant antimicrobial agents, and the aminoglycoside resistance gene aac(6')-Ib was found on different plasmids. Colistin resistance-associated mgrB/pmrB gene mutations were present in all isolates, and the yersiniabactin-encoding ybt gene was unique to the ST11 isolate. In conclusion, our findings provide insights into the genomic context of blaNDM-1/blaKPC-3 carbapenemase-producing KP isolates.IMPORTANCEThis study underscores the critical role of genomic surveillance as a proactive measure to restrict the spread of carbapenemase-producing KP isolates, especially when key antimicrobial resistance genes, such as blaNDM-1/blaKPC-3, are plasmid borne. In-depth characterization of these isolates may help identify plasmid similarities contributing to their intra-hospital/inter-hospital adaptation and transmission. Despite the lack of data on patient movements, it is possible that carbapenem-resistant isolates were selected to co-produce KP carbapenemase and New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase via plasmid acquisition. Studies employing long-read whole-genome sequencing should be encouraged to address the emergence of KP clones with converging phenotypes of virulence and resistance to last-resort antimicrobial agents.

Update of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases coronavirus disease 2019 guidelines: diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

SCOPE: Since the onset of COVID-19, several assays have been deployed for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first set of guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro diagnosis in February 2022. Because the COVID-19 landscape is rapidly evolving, the relevant ESCMID guidelines panel releases an update of the previously published recommendations on diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. This update aims to delineate the best diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2 in different populations based on current evidence. METHODS: An ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair, and the remaining selected with an open call. The panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, 2 panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. The panel reassessed the PICOs previously defined as priority in the first set of guidelines and decided to address 49 PICO questions, because 6 of them were discarded as outdated/non-clinically relevant. The 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)-adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations (ADOLOPMENT)' evidence-to-decision framework was used to produce the guidelines. QUESTIONS ADDRESSED BY THE GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS: After literature search, we updated 16 PICO questions; these PICOs address the use of antigen-based assays among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with different ages, COVID-19 severity status or risk for severe COVID-19, time since the onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, and finally, types of biomaterials used.

Efficient Recovery of Candida auris and Five Other Medically Important Candida Species from Blood Cultures Containing Clinically Relevant Concentrations of Antifungal Agents.

Candida auris and other Candida species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei) are important causes of bloodstream infection. Early or prolonged treatment with antifungal agents is often required. The inhibitory effect of antifungal agents in the patients' bloodstream may compromise the sensitivity of blood culture (BC) to diagnose and/or monitor patients with candidemia. Using a clinical BC simulation model, we compared antimicrobial drug-neutralizing BC media in BacT/Alert FA PLUS (FAP) or Bactec Plus Aerobic/F (PAF) bottles with non-neutralizing BC media in Bactec Mycosis IC/F (MICF) bottles to allow Candida growth in the presence of 100%, 50%, or 25% peak serum level (PSL) antifungal concentrations. In total, 117 organism/antifungal combinations were studied, and Candida growth was detected after incubating bottles into BacT/Alert VIRTUO or Bactec FX BC systems. Compared to control (without antifungal) bottles, both FAP and PAF bottles with 100% PSL antifungal concentrations allowed 100% recovery for C. auris, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, whereas recovery was below 100% for C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis. MICF bottles were less efficient at 100%, 50%, or 25% PSL antifungal concentrations, for all Candida species, except for C. auris. While azoles and amphotericin B did not hinder Candida growth in FAP or PAF bottles, echinocandins allowed C. auris, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis to grow in FAP, PAF, or MICF bottles. Overall, the maximum time to detection was 4.6 days. Taken together, our findings emphasize the reliability of BCs in patients undergoing antifungal treatment for candidemia. IMPORTANCE While echinocandins remain the preferred antifungal therapy for candidemia, bloodstream infections caused by C. auris, C. glabrata, or, at a lesser extent, C. parapsilosis may be difficult to treat with these antifungal agents. This is in view of the high propensity of the above-mentioned species to develop antifungal resistance or tolerance during treatment. Azoles and amphotericin B are possible alternatives. Thus, optimizing the recovery of Candida from BCs is important to exclude the likelihood of negative BCs for Candida species, owing to the inhibitory effect of antifungal agents present in the blood sample with which BCs are inoculated. Consistently, our results about the recovery of medically important Candida species (including C. auris) from simulated BCs in BacT/Alert FAP, Bactec PAF, or Bactec MICF bottles containing clinically relevant antifungal concentrations add support to this research topic, as well as to the use of BCs for monitoring the clinical and therapeutic course of candidemia.

COVID-19 increased in Italian children in the autumn and winter 2021-2022 period when Omicron was the dominant variant.

AIM: We examined the prevalence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children during the autumn and winter season from 1 September 2021 to 30 January 2022 and compared it with the same period in 2020-2021. METHODS: This study was carried out int the paediatric emergency department (PED) of a tertiary Italian hospital. We compared the clinical and demographical features of all children who presented during the two study periods and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: During the 2021-2022 autumn and winter season 5813 children presented to the PED, 19.0% were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 133 (12.0%) of those tested positive. In 2020-2021, 2914 presented to the PED, 12.3% were tested, and 30 (8.3%) of those tested positive. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical severity during the two study periods, despite a higher percentage of neurological symptoms in 2020-2021. Of the SARS-CoV-2-positive cases, 29/133 (21.8%) were hospitalised during the 2021-2022 season and 10/30 (33.3%) during the previous one. Only 3/163 children required intensive care. CONCLUSION: The greater spread of SARS-CoV-2 was probably due to the greater transmissibility of the Omicron variant, but the symptoms were mild and only 3 children required intensive care.

Chip-Based Molecular Evaluation of a DNA Extraction Protocol for Candida Species from Positive Blood Cultures.

The diagnosis of Candida bloodstream infection (BSI) may rely on a PCR-based analysis of a positive blood culture (PBC) obtained from the patient at the time of BSI. In this study, a yeast DNA extraction protocol for use on PBCs was developed and evaluated with the molecular mouse (MM) yeast blood (YBL) chip-based PCR assay, which allowed us to detect nine medically relevant Candida species. We studied 125 simulated or clinical PBCs for Candida species. A positive correlation between the DNA concentration and colony-forming unit count was found for simulated (Spearman's ρ = 0.58; p < 0.0001) and clinical (Spearman's ρ = 0.23, p = 0.09) PBCs. The extracted DNA yielded positive results with the MM YBL chip assay that agreed with the Candida species-level identification results for 63 (100%) of 63 isolates from simulated PBCs and 66 (99.5%) of 67 isolates from clinical PBCs. The false-negative result was for one C. tropicalis isolate that grew together with C. albicans in PBC. None of the 30 (Candida)-negative clinical BCs included as negative controls yielded a positive result with the MM YBL chip assay. Our DNA extraction protocol for the Candida species couples efficiency and simplicity together. Nevertheless, further studies are needed before it can be adopted for use with the MM YBL chip assay.

Resistance and virulence features of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections: Results of a nationwide Italian surveillance study.

Among Enterobacterales, Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) is one of the major opportunistic pathogens causing hospital-acquired infections. The most problematic phenomenon linked to Kp is related to the dissemination of multi-drug resistant (MDR) clones producing carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, representing a clinical and public health threat at a global scale. Over the past decades, high-risk MDR clones (e.g., ST512, ST307, ST101 producing bla KPC-type carbepenemases) have become endemic in several countries, including Italy. Concurrently, the spread of highly virulent Kp lineages (e.g., ST23, ST86) able to cause severe, community-acquired, pyogenic infections with metastatic dissemination in immunocompetent subjects has started to be documented. These clones, designated as hypervirulent Kp (hvKp), produce an extensive array of virulence factors and are highly virulent in previously validated animal models. While the prevalence and distribution of MDR Kp has been previously assessed at local and national level knowledge about dissemination of hvKp remains scarce. In this work, we studied the phenotypic and genotypic features of hypermucoviscous (HMV, as possible marker of increased virulence) Kp isolates from bloodstream infections (BSI), obtained in 2016-17 from 43 Italian Laboratories. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing and the use of two animal models (G. mellonella and murine) were employed to characterize collected isolates. Over 1502 BSI recorded in the study period, a total of 19 Kp were selected for further investigation based on their HMV phenotype. Results showed that hvKp isolates (ST5, ST8, ST11, ST25) are circulating in Italy, although with a low prevalence and in absence of a clonal expansion; convergence of virulence (yersiniabactin and/or salmochelin, aerobactin, regulators of mucoid phenotype) and antimicrobial-resistance (extended-spectrum beta-lactamases) features was observed in some cases. Conventional MDR Kp clones (ST307, ST512) may exhibit an HMV phenotype, but with a low virulence potential in the animal models. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first systematic survey on HMV and hvKp in Italy, employing a functional characterization of collected isolates. Future surveillance programs are warranted to monitor the threatening convergence of virulence and resistance among MDR Kp and the spread of hvKp.

Susceptibility of Meropenem-Resistant and/or Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam as Assessed by In Vitro Testing Methods.

This study aimed to assess the comparability of in vitro susceptibility testing methods to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Meropenem-resistant and/or carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested by both bioMérieux ETEST and VITEK-2 AST-N397 card and compared with a Micronaut AST-system broth microdilution (BMD) method. CZA and C/T MICs were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints. Of the 153 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 55.6% and 0.0% (VITEK 2) and 56.9% and 0.0% (ETEST and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. Of 52 P. aeruginosa isolates, 50.0% and 40.4% (VITEK 2, ETEST, and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. The essential agreement (EA) was 96.1% (197/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 95.6% (196/205; ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas EA was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 96.6% (198/205; ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. The categorical agreement (CA) was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas CA was 100% (VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. Categorical errors regarded four Enterobacteriaceae isolates. VITEK 2 and ETEST yielded equivalent CZA and C/T susceptibility testing results, compared to the BMD method, in such a clinical context.

SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Results to Infer Active or Non-Active Virus Replication Status in COVID-19 Patients.

We used nasopharyngeal swab samples of patients with a symptomatic (n = 82) or asymptomatic (n = 20) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis to assess the ability of antigen detection tests to infer active (potentially transmissible) or inactive (potentially non-transmissible) infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Using the subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) as an active replication marker of SARS-CoV-2, 48 (76.2%), 56 (88.9%), and 63 (100%) of 63 samples with sgRNA positive results tested positive with the SD BIOSENSOR STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag (Standard Q), the SD BIOSENSOR STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (Standard F), or the Fujirebio LUMIPULSE G SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Lumipulse) assay, respectively. Conversely, 37 (94.9%), 29 (74.4%), and 7 (17.9%) of 39 samples with sgRNA negative results tested negative with Standard Q, Standard F, or Lumipulse, respectively. Stratifying results by the number of days of symptoms before testing revealed that most antigen positive/sgRNA positive results were among samples tested at 2-7 days regardless of the assay used. Conversely, most antigen negative/sgRNA negative results were among samples tested at 16-30 days only when Standard Q or Standard F were used. In conclusion, based on our findings, a negative antigen test, especially with the Lumipulse assay, or a positive antigen test, especially with the Standard F assay, may suggest, respectively, the absence or presence of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2.

ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2.

SCOPE: The objective of these guidelines is to identify the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic approach for SARS-CoV-2. The recommendations are intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers. METHODS: An ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines task force was established by the ESCMID Executive Committee. A small group was established, half appointed by the chair and the remaining selected with an open call. Each panel met virtually once a week. For all decisions, a simple majority vote was used. A list of clinical questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) format was developed at the beginning of the process. For each PICO, two panel members performed a literature search focusing on systematic reviews, with a third panellist involved in case of inconsistent results. Quality of evidence assessment was based on the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of recommendations) approach. RECOMMENDATIONS: A total of 43 PICO questions were selected that involve the following types of populations: (a) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; (b) travellers, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; (c) asymptomatic individuals, and (d) close contacts of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The type of diagnostic test (commercial rapid nucleic acid amplification tests and rapid antigen detection), biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with an infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease are also taken into consideration.

ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 [Pré-print]

The present guideline has the objective of identifying the most appropriate diagnostic test and/or diagnostic/screening approach for1) patients with signs and symptoms of COVID-19; 2) travelers from areas with low and high COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare workers, and other individuals at risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2; 3) asymptomatic individuals (including general population) and 4) those with close contact with a person infected with SARS-CoV-2; and 5) symptomatic individuals following re-infection and/or vaccination. However, evidence for re-infection and post-vaccination testing approach was scarce when the literature search for the index guidelines was performed. Hence, associated PICOs could not be addressed. Additional considerations include the type of biomaterial, time since onset of symptoms/contact with infectious case, age, disease severity, and risk of developing severe disease. The document is intended to provide guidance to clinicians, clinical microbiologists, other health care personnel, and decision makers.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bacterial Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 Using a Multiplex PCR Assay: A Large Italian Hospital's Five-Month Experience.

Bacterial pneumonia is a challenging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) complication for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Upon its implementation, the FilmArray pneumonia plus (FA-PP) panel's practicability for both the diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy management of bacterial pneumonia was assessed in ICU patients with COVID-19. Respiratory samples were collected from patients who were mechanically ventilated at the time bacterial etiology and antimicrobial resistance were determined using both standard-of-care (culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing [AST]) and FA-PP panel testing methods. Changes to targeted and/or appropriate antimicrobial therapy were reviewed. We tested 212 samples from 150 patients suspected of bacterial pneumonia. Etiologically, 120 samples were positive by both methods, two samples were culture positive but FA-PP negative (i.e., negative for on-panel organisms), and 90 were negative by both methods. FA-PP detected no culture-growing organisms (mostly Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in 19 of 120 samples or antimicrobial resistance genes in two culture-negative samples for S. aureus organisms. Fifty-nine (27.8%) of 212 samples were from empirically treated patients. Antibiotics were discontinued in 5 (33.3%) of 15 patients with FA-PP-negative samples and were escalated/deescalated in 39 (88.6%) of 44 patients with FA-PP-positive samples. Overall, antibiotics were initiated in 87 (72.5%) of 120 pneumonia episodes and were not administered in 80 (87.0%) of 92 nonpneumonia episodes. Antimicrobial-resistant organisms caused 78 (60.0%) of 120 episodes. Excluding 19 colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii episodes, AST confirmed appropriate antibiotic receipt in 101 (84.2%) of 120 episodes for one or more FA-PP-detected organisms. Compared to standard-of-care testing, the FA-PP panel may be of great value in the management of COVID-19 patients at risk of developing bacterial pneumonia in the ICU. IMPORTANCE Since bacterial pneumonia is relatively frequent, suspicion of it in COVID-19 patients may prompt ICU clinicians to overuse (broad-spectrum) antibiotics, particularly when empirical antibiotics do not cover the suspected pathogen. We showed that a PCR-based, culture-independent laboratory assay allows not only accurate diagnosis but also streamlining of antimicrobial therapy for bacterial pneumonia episodes. We report on the actual implementation of rapid diagnostics and its real-life impact on patient treatment, which is a gain over previously published studies on the topic. A better understanding of the role of that or similar PCR assays in routine ICU practice may lead us to appreciate the effectiveness of their implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A New PCR-Based Assay for Testing Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples from Patients with Suspected Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia.

To support the clinical laboratory diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ) pneumonia (PCP), an invasive fungal infection mainly occurring in HIV-negative patients, in-house or commercial PJ-specific real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays are todays' reliable options. The performance of these assays depends on the type of PJ gene (multi-copy mitochondrial versus single-copy nuclear) targeted by the assay. We described the development of a PJ-PCR assay targeting the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-encoding gene. After delineating its analytical performance, the PJ-PCR assay was used to test bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples from 200 patients (only seven were HIV positive) with suspected PCP. Of 211 BAL fluid samples, 18 (8.5%) were positive and 193 (91.5%) were negative by PJ-PCR. Of 18 PJ-PCR-positive samples, 11 (61.1%) tested positive and seven (38.9%) tested negative with the immunofluorescence assay (IFA). All (100%) of the 193 PJ-PCR-negative samples were IFA negative. Based on IFA/PCR results, patients were, respectively, classified as having (n = 18) and not having (n = 182) proven (PJ-PCR+/IFA+) or probable (PJ-PCR+/IFA-) PCP. For 182 patients without PCP, alternative infectious or non-infectious etiologies were identified. Our PJ-PCR assay was at least equivalent to IFA, fostering studies aimed at defining a qPCR-based standard for PCP diagnosis in the future.

Direct Testing for KPC-Mediated Carbapenem Resistance from Blood Samples Using a T2 Magnetic Resonance Based Assay.

Molecular-based carbapenem resistance testing in Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) is currently limited because of the reliance on positive blood culture (BC) samples. The T2Resistance™ panel may now allow the detection of carbapenemase- and other ß-lactamase encoding genes directly from blood samples. We detected carbapenem resistance genes in 11 (84.6%) of 13 samples from patients with BC-documented BSIs (10 caused by KPC-producing Klebsiellapneumoniae and 1 caused by VIM/CMY-producing Citrobacter freundii). Two samples that tested negative for carbapenem resistance genes were from patients with BC-documented BSIs caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae who were receiving effective antibiotic therapy. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the T2Resistance™ panel can be a reliable tool for diagnosing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial BSIs.

SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection to Expand Testing Capacity for COVID-19: Results from a Hospital Emergency Department Testing Site.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection has currently expanded the testing capacity for COVID-19, which yet relies on the SARS-CoV-2 RNA RT-PCR amplification. OBJECTIVES: To report on a COVID-19 testing algorithm from a tertiary care hospital emergency department (ED) that combines both antigen (performed on the ED) and RT-PCR (performed outside the ED) testing. METHODS: Between December 2020 and January 2021, in a priori designated, spatially separated COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 ED areas, respectively, symptomatic or asymptomatic patients received SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing on nasopharyngeal swab samples. Antigen results were promptly accessible to guide subsequent, outside performed confirmatory (RT-PCR) testing. RESULTS: Overall, 1083 (100%) of 1083 samples in the COVID-19 area and 1815 (49.4%) of 3670 samples in the non-COVID-19 area had antigen results that required confirmation by RT-PCR. Antigen positivity rates were 12.4% (134/1083) and 3.7% (66/1815), respectively. Compared to RT-PCR testing results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of antigen testing were, respectively, 68.0%, 98.3%, 88.8%, and 94.1% in the COVID-19 area, and 41.9%, 97.3%, 27.3%, and 98.6% in non-COVID-19 area. Practically, RT-PCR tests were avoided in 50.6% (1855/3670) of non-COVID-19 area samples (all antigen negative) from patients who, otherwise, would have needed antigen result confirmation. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm had value to preserve RT-PCR from avoidable usage and, importantly, to save time, which translated into a timely RT-PCR result availability in the COVID-19 area.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time-kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21-1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria.